Choosing your Petit Lenormand deck is a different process from selecting a tarot deck, such as the Tarot de Marseille or the Rider-Waite-Smith. When purchasing a tarot, the choice is often guided by a crush, aesthetic reasons, or a personal connection with the deck. These elements often outweigh other considerations, such as adherence to traditional symbols or the graphic innovation of the deck. In other words, tarot choices can be quite impulsive and emotional, influenced by a "heart's impulse".
The Petit Lenormand, although sometimes subject to the same impulses, requires a different approach. If the aesthetics of a Petit Lenormand deck can play an important role in the choice, other specific criteria come into play. These criteria go beyond simple graphic or aesthetic preferences. They are often related to the deck's functionality and elements that directly affect its use.
That is why this article exists: to guide you in choosing a Petit Lenormand deck. Unlike tarot, some specific criteria for Lenormand are not present or are rarely relevant for tarot decks.
Before exploring these criteria, two things need to be clarified:
Although this article mainly focuses on specific criteria, it is important to mention some classic aspects that are often decisive for users. These basic criteria deserve attention:
The quality of materials is essential. This includes elements like laminated cardstock, the presence of gilding, the durability of the cards, and their ease of shuffling. These characteristics directly influence the user experience, especially if the cards are used frequently. A sturdy and pleasant-to-touch deck can greatly improve your comfort while practicing. Some decks offer laminated or waterproof cards, which can be useful for outdoor practices; however, be careful that the cards do not become sticky.
The price of a deck can be a decisive factor, especially for beginners. If you are just starting and hesitant to invest, choose affordable options to begin with. Keep in mind, however, that a higher price does not guarantee the quality or effectiveness of the deck. Some more economical decks may perfectly meet your needs. Some expensive decks include booklets or detailed guides, which can justify the cost for a deeper learning experience.
Ultimately, the most important criterion remains personal affinity with a deck. Whether you are a novice or experienced, the best choice is the one that inspires you and with which you feel comfortable. Technical or aesthetic features will never replace the unique connection you can have with your cards. Even a technically imperfect deck can become a powerful tool if it resonates with the cartomancer.
When choosing a Petit Lenormand deck, a common question is the opposition between tradition and modernity. Should you favor a traditional deck or a modern one?
Traditional decks, often sought after by history enthusiasts and those drawn to classic symbolism, offer historical grounding and timeless authenticity. Some collectors or enthusiasts even opt for vintage editions, printed decades ago, which can be found on auction sites or in specialized stores.
In contrast, modern decks stand out for their creativity and stylistic openness. They often adopt minimalist designs, contemporary illustrations, or highly detailed and colorful graphics. These decks bring a personal touch that can appeal through their originality or their ability to adapt to more current sensibilities.
However, reducing the choice to this dichotomy can be limiting. In reality, this criterion is primarily about personal aesthetics, and everyone can have very varied preferences. The key is to find a deck that resonates with you, whether through its connection to tradition or its modern boldness.
To make an informed choice, why not experiment with both types? Traditional decks can enrich your practice through their respect for the Lenormand system, while modern decks allow you to explore new perspectives and interpretations. This diversity of styles is a strength, and there is no "right" or "wrong" choice: what matters is the connection you develop with your deck.
An often overlooked but interesting criterion is the possibility of choosing a Lenormand deck with white or free spaces in the illustrations for making personal annotations.
Historically, figures like Madame Lenormand and Jean-Baptiste Alliette (alias Etteilla) would annotate their card decks. This practice is not new and is still common in traditional cartomancy. For example, in classic card decks used for cartomancy (French-suited decks like those used in poker or belote), no divinatory indications are provided. Practitioners often write keywords or interpretations directly on their cards, either to personalize their method or to structure their readings.
Although Lenormand is not strictly a form of traditional cartomancy, it is closely related. Each card in the Petit Lenormand deck is associated with a color and a card value from classic card decks. Adding annotations can therefore be a creative way to make the Lenormand more personal and expand interpretations, especially for practices like psychological Lenormand.
In this context, annotating the cards can become a valuable tool, especially when moving beyond classical interpretations or wanting to explore areas not traditionally covered by Lenormand, such as personal development.
The Maybe Lenormand is a good example of this criterion. This minimalist deck follows the standard poker format, which is practical for a Lenormand deck. The illustrations feature large white areas perfect for personal annotations, such as keywords.
However, this deck also has limitations:
In sum, if we stick to the 36 standard cards of the Maybe Lenormand, this deck can appeal with its simplicity and minimalism. But its lack of readability and the addition of unnecessary cards could disrupt some users.
In addition to decks with large white spaces for annotations, another option is to choose decks that already contain printed keywords on the cards. These keywords are especially useful for beginners, as they make it easier to learn and interpret the readings of the Petit Lenormand.
The addition of keywords directly on the cards can help practitioners develop their interpretations, while providing a structured framework. However, the quality of these keywords, their organization, and the design of the cards play a crucial role in their effectiveness.
This deck is largely inspired by the Grand Jeu of Mademoiselle Lenormand, although it is a different system. Each card contains between 6 and 8 keywords in French and English.
This deck, self-published by Anne-Marie Costanza, is entirely in French and features a large number of keywords on each card.
Anne-Marie Costanza recently released a new deck, the Walldoff Lenormand (November 2024). This deck addresses some of the limitations of its predecessor:
This new deck could become a reference for both beginner and experienced users.
Decks with integrated keywords, such as the Petit Lenormand by Grimaud or the Maestro Lenormand by Anne-Marie Costanza, meet specific needs, particularly for learning. Although each has its strengths and weaknesses, their usefulness depends on the expectations of the users: pedagogy and structure for beginners, or flexibility and personalization for advanced practitioners. The new Walldoff Lenormand, with its convenient size and improvements, could meet some of these expectations.
The direction of the characters' gaze is an interpretation criterion that is sometimes controversial but important for some practitioners of the Petit Lenormand. In particular, the orientation of the cards representing the man, the woman, and the rider can influence the reading of a spread, especially in configurations like the Grand Tableau.
Some cartomancers insist that the man and the woman must be arranged in such a way that they are either looking at each other or turning their backs on each other, depending on the situation. For example:
The rider, too, is often expected to "move from left to right", a direction deemed more natural in Western reading.
This approach echoes that of the Marseille Tarot, where the direction of gaze is also significant. In tarot, the French master craftsmen of the Renaissance designed the gazes to convey precise meanings, an aspect further emphasized by the reversed meaning of the cards. However, for the Petit Lenormand, while this notion is interesting, it seems less important than other aspects, such as card combinations or positions.
Ciro Marchetti, creator of the Lustrous Lenormand, emphasizes in his manual the importance of the direction of gazes, not only for the man and the woman but also for cards like the ship, the fox, or the bear. According to him, this orientation adds an extra dimension to the interpretation.
This deck stands out for several notable features:
The direction of the characters' gazes in the Petit Lenormand is a divisive factor. While decks like the Lustrous Lenormand by Ciro Marchetti offer interesting options to explore this dimension, it is important not to overlook other essential elements of interpretation, such as the combinations, the Houses, and the "Near/Far" method. This criterion can make it easier for beginners to interpret, but it can also trap them in a binary approach to the relationship between the two individuals.
With the rise of the LGBTQIA+ movement and the growing recognition of non-binary identities, the world of cartomancy is also evolving. In the traditional Petit Lenormand system, the Significator cards play a central role, especially in love readings, where they represent the protagonists of the relationship. However, not all decks offer options that are suitable for contemporary realities, such as same-sex or non-binary relationships.
In the context of love readings, it seems natural that for a same-sex relationship, both Significators should be men or both women. However, many traditional Petit Lenormand decks do not contain additional cards to represent these configurations. Yet, with the recognition of minority rights, such as marriage equality, and an increased sensitivity to inclusion, adding complementary cards (a second man and a second woman) becomes a welcome addition.
Although this practice is still rare, it reflects an acknowledgment of diversity in a field that has long been rooted in old conventions. This can enrich readings, making them more inclusive and suited to a variety of situations.
This deck offers two additional cards for men and women, allowing it to adapt to same-sex configurations or simply offer more flexibility in readings.
This modern and highly regarded deck stands out for its soft and "cute" aesthetic, ideal for those seeking a pleasant visual experience.
The addition of bonus cards in Lenormand decks is a growing trend, offering cartomancers greater flexibility in interpretation and increased depth. However, this does not mean that traditional 36-card decks lose their effectiveness.
The 36 cards of the classic Lenormand system, although effective and proven for over 200 years, have certain limitations:
However, in the extended Grand Tableau spread, these bonus cards can be problematic, as this spread exposes 36 cards at most (unless an additional column is added, increasing the spread to 40 cards, for example). Their use often involves replacing a standard card with a bonus card, a practice that remains personal and subjective.
This deck stands out for its minimalist aesthetic and the addition of several bonus cards, including:
Highly popular, this deck offers an impressive number of bonus cards, including two Men and two Women, looking in different directions.
Although bonus cards enrich the experience, their absence does not diminish the effectiveness of 36-card decks. These, with their direct symbolism and simplicity, remain perfectly suited to all types of readings, from the simplest to the most complex. The longevity of the Lenormand system proves its robustness and relevance, even though the psychological approach and the modernity of our world could benefit from some adjustments.
This criterion mainly applies to modern Lenormand decks, which stand out for their enriched or reimagined artwork compared to traditional decks. The latter often feature standardized images, typically perceived as "vintage." Modern deck creators sometimes introduce additional elements in the illustrations, providing extra interpretive clues or making them easier to read. This enhances the symbolic depth and offers a renewed experience for users.
Created by Lynn Araujo, this deck reinterprets traditional cards with poetic illustrations and quirky symbols:
However, some cards in the Dreaming Way Lenormand puzzle me:
Created by Regula Elizabeth Fiechter and Urban Trösch, this deck takes symbolic richness even further:
Unlike the Dreaming Way Lenormand, the Mystical Lenormand manages to balance symbolic richness with respect for traditional interpretations. This makes it an interesting tool for cartomancers, even beginners.
While the enriched graphics of modern decks add new dimensions to interpretations, they can also unsettle readers attached to traditional meanings. It's important to choose a deck that suits your needs: a minimalist visual for a straightforward approach or rich graphics for a more intuitive and detailed exploration. These variations in no way diminish the value of classic decks, which remain time-tested references.
In contrast to the previous section, where we discussed richly illustrated card decks, it's also possible to choose Lenormand decks with simple, minimalist artwork. This visual simplicity can be particularly appreciated, especially during readings involving a large number of cards. For example, in the case of a Grand Tableau, which uses all 36 cards in the deck, it becomes essential to have clear and readable images. Indeed, overly detailed cards can hinder a smooth overall view and the global understanding of the spread. Opting for a minimalist design thus ensures optimal readability while facilitating interpretation.
This criterion highlights the importance of choosing a deck that fits not only your aesthetic preferences but also your practical needs and level of experience.
A minimalist deck example is the UR Lenormand, a traditional deck likely published in 1799. This historical deck stands out for its extreme simplicity, true to the origins of the Petit Lenormand.
Another interesting example is the 7th Sphere Lenormand, a modern deck that, while different from the UR Lenormand, shares this aim of simplicity. This minimalist deck is particularly well-suited for Grand Tableaus, where readability is crucial.
For me, card size is a key criterion when choosing a Petit Lenormand. Although it generally isn't an issue, some decks may prove unsuitable due to their dimensions. Unlike tarot, where card size isn't a determining factor in my practice, the specificity of the Petit Lenormand makes this criterion crucial. My method relies 80% on the Grand Tableau, a spread that uses all 36 cards of the deck. For this reason, it's essential that the cards are small enough to avoid overwhelming the available table space.
The poker format is a non-negotiable requirement for me. If a deck doesn't adhere to this size (give or take a few millimeters), I prefer not to use it, even if other qualities might make it appealing. Take the Gilded Reverie Lenormand as an example: though it's a visually stunning deck with a strong aesthetic coherence, its cards are too large to be practical for my mat-based spreads.
In fact, I use a mat for the Grand Tableau whose dimensions are designed to accommodate poker-sized cards. These mats facilitate the card layout (in my case, random or intuitive, rather than the usual left-to-right, top-to-bottom method). Thus, despite its strengths, the Gilded Reverie is excluded from my practices for this specific reason.
The Piatnik Lenormand is an excellent example of a deck that perfectly adheres to the poker format. This traditional deck stands out for its simple and clear illustrations, making it particularly suitable for the Grand Tableau. Unlike the Gilded Reverie, the images on the Piatnik cards are more easily distinguishable from one another. This improves readability and avoids confusion during interpretation. It follows the standard poker size, making it ergonomic and practical to use.
Another interesting deck is the antique pocket version of the Petit Lenormand, published by Le Chaudron Magique. This deck is particularly compact, measuring 7.7 cm x 4 cm, making it ideal for limited spaces or transport. While its proportions resemble the rectangular shape of tarot cards, its small size makes it a versatile tool, especially for practices requiring multiple decks.
One of its unique features is its optimal use for methods like Mobile Houses. This concept involves overlaying two decks: one for the Houses and another for the house guests. Thanks to its reduced size, the antique pocket version combines perfectly with a standard-sized deck for this type of spread. For more details, see my article on Houses and the Mobile Houses spread.
In summary, card size plays a crucial role in my Lenormand practice due to the use of a mat. This selection criterion depends on your own usage context (mat use, frequency of Grand Tableau spreads).
The back of the cards is, for me, an essential criterion, far more important than one might imagine. This may seem surprising, but this detail plays a key role in how I practice card reading (Lenormand or Tarot). Unlike a mechanical method where cards are simply drawn one by one from the top of the deck, I proceed differently.
I start by shuffling the cards flat, face down. Then, I intuitively choose cards from those spread out before me to place them on the mat’s spots (without following the usual sequential reading order). This process requires the card backs' design to be sensorially engaging, as it influences my connection with the cards.
For me, the patterns on the back of the cards play a subtle but decisive role. I have a particular affinity for backs featuring lattice, tile, or fractal patterns, inspired by historical tarot decks. These classic designs seem to "activate" an intuitive perception, as if I could "dive" into the cards. Certain patterns stand out more vividly in my mind, as if they were embossed. I perceive these patterns as "full" or "empty," helping me choose cards smoothly.
Conversely, card backs that are too modern or with generic patterns (plain colors, simple images) diminish this perceptual effect. This criterion is central to my deck choices, but it also limits my options since few available decks feature card backs that meet my expectations.
The Cartamundi deck is an excellent example that meets this criterion.
This deck allows me to fully leverage my intuitive method while maintaining good readability and fluidity in spreads.
In summary, the importance of card backs highlights a very personal aspect of Petit Lenormand practice. This criterion, while subjective, deserves consideration when choosing your deck, keeping in mind that it shouldn't overshadow other essential characteristics such as readability or illustration coherence. To further inspire you, I recommend exploring different card backs and testing their impact on your intuition.
As you may have noticed throughout this article, there is no Petit Lenormand deck for me that perfectly meets all of my selection criteria. Unlike tarot, where I have been able to find decks that exactly match my expectations, I have not yet found the "perfect" Petit Lenormand. That said, I have a few favorites that I use regularly based on my needs and preferences. My favorite decks
Among my favorites, there are:
I invite you to share your remarks or questions in the comments below. Your contribution is valuable and can help someone else find their dream Lenormand.
Copyright © TarotQuest.fr